The Religion of Global Warming has followers.

This link is an interesting article on climate change. If man made CO2 emissions are the dominate force behind global warming then why is there evidence of a cover up strategy for any data to the contrary? It should not be necessary to repress data for political purposes.

Should we really call it Global Warming or is Global Climate Change a more realistic term? Changing the terms of an unpopular unproven theory is one way to help it gain political approval. Since the weather is always changing, who can deny that Global Climate Change is a reality. No matter what the weather does it provides positive data for Global Climate Change.

When are we due for the next ice age? Global Climate Change will be the inevitable culprit of that cataclysmic event no doubt.

DailyTech - Climatologists Trade Tips on Destroying Evidence, Evangelizing Warming:

'via Blog this'